Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
FENWICK v. RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv07354
Plaintiff: FRANCIS FENWICK and EDWARD SAFRAN
Defendant: RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BALDEVARONA et al v. TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA et al
as 2:2012cv01389
Plaintiff: JANETH BALDEVARONA and JOVEN BALDEVARNO
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA , DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION , TARGET CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE CELLULAR SIGNAL PLUS, INC. et al v. MCALINDIN et al
as 3:2011cv05201
Plaintiff: THE CELLULAR SIGNAL PLUS, INC. , GABE BRAVO and MARTA BRAVO
Defendant: BRIAN MCALINDIN, JORI MCALINDIN, ROBERT ANZALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ZELMA v. MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03465
Plaintiff: RICHARD M. ZELMA
Defendant: MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. , VAROLII, INC. , WEST CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AETNA HEALTH INC. et al v. ACCURSO, M.D. et al
as 1:2008cv04673
Plaintiff: AETNA HEALTH INC. and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: CHARLES ACCURSO, M.D., CENTRAL JERSEY AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C., DIGESTIVE HEALTHCARE CENTER, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
COYLE v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., et al
as 1:2008cv02121
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. COYLE, JR.
Defendant: LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.,, ERIK KALLET, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEE v. STATE OF UNIVERSITY OF THE NEW JERSEY RUTGERS et al
as 3:2007cv03288
Plaintiff: PATRICK LEE
Defendant: STATE UNIVERSITY OF THE NEW JERSEY RUTGERS, RICHARD L MCCORMICK, JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?