Cases 11 - 17 of 17
AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY v. GARFIELD et al
as 1:2014cv02724
Plaintiff:
AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DAVID L. GARFIELD, ESTATE OF DAVID L. GARFIELD, GARFIELD CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'ALESSANDRO v. THE HINCKLEY COMPANY et al
as 3:2013cv05435
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR G. D'ALESSANDRO
Defendant:
THE HINCKLEY COMPANY , HINCKLEY YACHT SERVICES , THE TALARIA COMPANY, LLC. and others
Counter_claimant:
JON BEACH , THE HINCKLEY COMPANY , THE TALARIA COMPANY, LLC. and others
Counter_defendant:
ARTHUR G. D'ALESSANDRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. et al v. FDR SERVICES CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. and JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
FDR SERVICES CORP. , JOHN DOE and RICHARD ROE
Counter_claimant:
FDR SERVICES CORP.
Counter_defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER and LIBERTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
STEVENS et al v. NICHOLAS CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04816
Plaintiff:
TAFFY STEVENS
Defendant:
NICHOLAS CONTRACTING, INC., NICHOLAS FRASCONE, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTEY v. LABCORP et al
as 1:2011cv04130
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PETTEY
Defendant:
LABCORP , JOHN DOE, I THROUGH V, ANTOINETTE JEFFERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSE v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv06005
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS ROSE
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AUTO INJURY SOLUTIONS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
XACTA 3000 v. UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv02149
Plaintiff:
XACTA 3000
Defendant:
UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC., UPS, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
