Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PFIZER INC. et al v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02227
Plaintiff:
PBG PUERTO RICO LLC, PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V. and others
Defendant:
ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PFIZER INC. et al v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02222
Plaintiff:
PBG PUERTO RICO LLC, PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V. and others
Defendant:
ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PFIZER INC. et al v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02222
Plaintiff:
PBG PUERTO RICO LLC, PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V. and others
Defendant:
ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PFIZER INC. et al v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02227
Plaintiff:
PBG PUERTO RICO LLC, PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V. and others
Defendant:
ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2019cv12096
Defendant:
GLORIA PEREZ and LENA Y CARBON RICO V INC.
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv02939
Plaintiff:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PLC and SB PHARMCO PUERTO RICO INC.
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PLC et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 1:2007cv02238
Plaintiff:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PLC, SB PHARMCO PUERTO RICO INC. and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
