Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv19011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv14804
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CATAPULT LEARNING , LLC et al v. INFINITIVE SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2018cv12069
Respondent:
Infinitive Solutions, Inc. and STERLING NATIONAL BANK
Petitioner:
Catapult Learning West, LLC, NonPublic Education Services, Inc, CATAPULT LEARNING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK v. MEDICAL PLAZA SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2018mc00043
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
MEDICAL PLAZA SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.P., RICHARD NUILA CROUSE, DAVID H. JANOWITZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv06575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CAPONEGRO v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2015cv03431
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR B CAPONEGRO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAYTON and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
IPEG Limited Liability Company v. Valley National Bank
as 2:2014cv06942
Plaintiff:
IPEG LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant:
VALLEY NATIONAL BANK
Respondent:
NCR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
