Cases 31 - 40 of 431
Monica Zortea v. Samsung Electronics America Inc, et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
MONICA ZORTEA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
Monica Zortea v. Costco Wholesale Corp
as 23-8009
Respondent:
MONICA ZORTEA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sherry Lewis, et al v. GEICO
as 22-8055
Respondent:
SHERRY LEWIS and DAVID V. LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarity situated
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Allegheny County Employees Retirement System v. Energy Transfer LP, et al
as 22-8045
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Petitioner:
ENERGY TRANSFER LP, KELCY L. WARREN, JOHN W. MCREYNOLDS and others
Ryan Dobbs v. Health IQ Insurance Services Inc
as 22-2588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DOBBS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
HEALTH IQ INSURANCE SERVICES INC
In re: EQT Corporation Securities Litigation
as 22-8041
Respondent:
GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS ANNUITY FUND, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS PENSION FUND and others
Petitioner:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2483
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
