Cases 31 - 40 of 52
TALONE et al v. THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2016cv04644
Plaintiff:
ALBERT TALONE, D.O. , CRAIG WAX, D.O. , RICHARD RENZA, D.O. and others
Defendant:
THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CONSERVATION FORCE et al v. PORRINO, et al
as 3:2016cv04124
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION FORCE , ROBERT VIDEN, JR. , PETER HEFFERAN and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PORRINO and BOB MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CRAIG v. BASNIGHT et al
as 3:2015cv07847
Petitioner:
PAULA CRAIG
Respondent:
RHOLANDA BASNIGHT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
OGUNKOYA et al v. ROWE et al
as 2:2015cv06955
Plaintiff:
ADENIYI OGUNKOYA and CRANBURY OVERSEAS, LLC
Defendant:
PHILLIPS DEEN ROWE, JOANNE WESTERLING, THOMAS CRAIG ODELL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LAX
as 2:2015cv01079
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CRAIG S. LAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Reiber et al v. NYK Line (North America) Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06619
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Reiber , Craig Buske , Elizabeth Allis and others
Defendant:
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.), NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
