Cases 31 - 40 of 171
KENT v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2022cv02845
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
EDWARD C. BRITTON and NATURAL IMPACT HEALTH AND FITNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
KENT v. HOOPER et al
as 2:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
LARRY HOOPER Individually and d/b/a Hooper Ranch, HOOPER RANCH and LARRY HOOPER Individually doing business as HOOPER RANCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
KENT v. BYDALEK et al
as 2:2022cv01811
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
JEFFREY BYDALEK, CREDIT THE AMERICAS LP, FX ALGO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
KENT v. HIGHTOWER et al
as 2:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
RONALD HIGHTOWER, JANET HIGHTOWER, BLACKBURN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Kent v. McAfee Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
McAfee Corp., Jon Winkelried, Kathy Willard and others
KENT v. DENISE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
DENISE JORDAN, ENTERCORE, INC., ORANGE SPLENDOR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Kent v. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Garry A. Neil, Jayson Dallas and others
Kent v. Discovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Discovery, Inc., Robert R. Beck, Robert L. Johnson and others
KENT v. IREGUI et al
as 2:2021cv20691
Defendant:
RENATO IREGUI, RENATO ALESSANDRO IREGUI, RENATO ESCOBAR IREGUI and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
KENT v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2021cv20754
Defendant:
RICHARD SHAWN ELLIS, HOTEL CARBON HQ, INC., R. SHAWN ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
