Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LANDRUM v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 1:2010cv03944
Plaintiff:
SONYA LANDRUM
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
-JS In Re: BAYSIDE LITIGATION, et al v. , et al
as 1:1997cv05127
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
TONY BACON , ANDREW GORDON , MICHAEL S. SHONTZ and others
Consol_defendant:
CLEMENT , MYERS , JOHN CONESKY and others
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 1:2010cv01094
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SMITH and BRENDA SMITH
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BEGLEY v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 1:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BEGLEY
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRADFORD et al v. TRIPLE A GROUP, INC.
as 2:2009mc00308
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRADFORD, PAT DAMIANI, JR., JOSEPH DELEONARDIS and others
Defendant:
TRIPLE A GROUP, INC.
PHILLIP C. ENGERS, et al v. AT&T AND AT&T MANAGE, et al
as 2:1998cv03660
Defendant:
AT&T , AT&T MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN , AT&T INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP C. ENGERS , WARREN J. MCFALL , DONALD G. NOERR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1149 Recover Pension & Profit Sharing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
