Cases 1 - 10 of 49
MIDWOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. MERENDINO
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
MIDWOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ANTHONY BRANDS USA, INC., STEVEN DEUTSCH and others
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVEN MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HAMMOND v. KENVUE INC. et al
as 1:2023cv20998
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAMMOND
Defendant:
KENVUE INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
HAMMOND v. KENVUE INC. et al
as 3:2023cv20998
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAMMOND
Defendant:
KENVUE INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DEUTSCH v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 3:2022cv02904
Petitioner:
THOMAS DEUTSCH
Respondent:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KARIMI v. DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 1:2020cv08978
Defendant:
JAMES VON MOLTKE, DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, JOHN CRYAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALI KARIMI
KARIMI v. DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2020cv08978
Defendant:
JAMES VON MOLTKE, DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, JOHN CRYAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALI KARIMI
WU v. GSX TECHEDU INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04457
Defendant:
LARRY XIANGDONG CHEN, NAN SHEN, GSX TECHEDU INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ZEQIU WU, COREY HAYS and ALEXANDRE TAZI
Petitioner:
Robert Angeline
Lead Plaintiff:
YANG RENBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
