Cases 1 - 10 of 2,600
In re: Christopher Hanson
as 24-2018
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER HANSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
In re: Eric Cacho
as 24-2082
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC CACHO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Safehouse, et al
as 24-2027
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAFEHOUSE, A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation and JOSE BENITEZ, as President and Treasurer of Safehouse
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mu'Mit Muhammad a/k/a Keith Lamont DrainIn re: Mu'Mit Muhammad a/k/a Keith Lamont Drain
as 24-1995
Petitioner:
In re: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD A/K/A KEITH LAMONT DRAIN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CENTRE COUNTY
Mark BrownIn re: Mark Brown
as 24-1994
Petitioner:
In re: MARK A. BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Shalef BellIn re: Shalef Bell
as 24-1964
Petitioner:
In re: SHALEF BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Neil Pal v. , et alIn re: Neil Pal v. , et al
as 24-1940
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL PAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Rodrick BrayboyIn re: Rodrick Brayboy
as 24-1924
Petitioner:
In re: RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent:
MAHANOY SCI, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and others
David TurnerIn re: David Turner
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID TURNER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
