Cases 51 - 60 of 264
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 2.878-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00716
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
2.878-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, JOHN GILBERT WINANT, JR., CATHERINE WINANT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.04-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.04-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, GENE M. GROSSMAN and JEAN B. GROSSMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.20-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.20-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, EUGENE CAPUTO, CHRISTINE CAPUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.877 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.877 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, LOUISA COLE, THE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 2.221-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
2.221-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, READINGTON RIVER, LLC and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BY THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 3.335-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
3.335-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON , THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 9.235-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
9.235-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF MONTGONERY , PRL CHERRY VALLEY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.803-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.803-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENRIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and COUNTY OF SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.102 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.102 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.763-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.763-ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, NEMEH SAQA, JOHN J. SAQA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
