Cases 1 - 4 of 4
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.65 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.28 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-4 et al
as 3:2018cv01973
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.65 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.28 ACRES IN DELAWARE TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1007-31-4, THEODORE BENCH, JR., EUNICE BENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.01 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-26-14 et al
as 3:2018cv01998
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.01 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-26-14, CORINNE L. HASTINGS, GEORGE R. LEAP, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.95 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.74 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-8-38 et al
as 3:2018cv01915
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.95 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.74 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-8-38, PHILIP MULLER, SUZANNE MULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 754
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.23 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.33 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-20-10 et al
as 3:2018cv01750
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.23 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.33 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-20-10, CASEY LYNN MUENCH, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
