Cases 91 - 100 of 26,914
WILLIAMS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67651
Plaintiff:
FRANCES V WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67581
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND G. SMITH
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67377
Plaintiff:
GERTRUDE B. PIERCE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIOTT et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67648
Plaintiff:
CLEO M ELLIOTT and THOMAS ELLIOTT
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMB v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67539
Plaintiff:
ROY LAMB
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67470
Plaintiff:
AREATHA J. BURKE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIBLEY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67656
Plaintiff:
JUANITA R. SIBLEY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRUITT v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67342
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. PRUITT
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNEAD et al v. H.K PORTER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67559
Plaintiff:
ROY W. SNEAD and GRACE O. SNEAD
Defendant:
H.K PORTER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POATES et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67464
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. POATES and EDNA POATES
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
