Cases 11 - 18 of 18
EDDY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64314
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDDY, RICHARD EDDY and RICHARD EDDY
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, VIAD CORP., TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LARSEN v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64308
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LARSEN, WILLIAM LARSEN and WILLIAM LARSEN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, VIAD CORP., TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KACSUTA v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64313
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KACSUTA, ROBERT KACSUTA and ROBERT KACSUTA
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, VIAD CORP., TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALLACE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64311
Plaintiff:
NORRIS WALLACE, NORRIS WALLACE and NORRIS WALLACE
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, VIAD CORP., TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60004
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60005
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Seitz et al v. Adel Wiggins Group et al
as 1:2008cv00353
Plaintiff:
Frederick Seitz and Mary Louise Seitz
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins Group, Aerojet General Corporation, Air Cooled Motors and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARLISLE v. AVCO CORPORATION et al
as 5:2007cv73543
Plaintiff:
WANDA K. CARLISLE
Defendant:
AVCO CORPORATION, THE BOEING COMPANY, THE BOEING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
