Cases 21 - 30 of 110
MARTINEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv05535
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THE ESTATE OF MARIA CARMELINA TUBON CAMACHO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF MARIA CARMELINA TUBON CAMACHO, JUAN SEGUNDO TUSA QUINDE, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR and JUAN SEGUNDO TUSA QUINDE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CLAUDIA C. NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
JENKINS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05329
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA JENKINS
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL REASEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01453
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MINVIELLE v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00845
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MINVIELLE
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VELARDE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2022cv00266
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA VELARDE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ATKINSON v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv17117
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA ATKINSON
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIOS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv16372
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA RIOS and SALVADOR QUINTERO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF CLAUDIA THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv16009
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF CLAUDIA THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv14785
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
