Cases 21 - 30 of 97
CASE et al v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv71874
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. CASE and DELL E. CASE
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING CO., KEENE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
O'BRYAN v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90735
Plaintiff:
CHARLES O'BRYAN and CHARLES O'BRYAN
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHEAST ILLINOIS RAILROAD CORPORATION and NORTHEAST ILLINOIS RAILROAD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LARKINS v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89881
Plaintiff:
HAZEL H LARKINS
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY and ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SLOVER v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89554
Plaintiff:
SHELDON SLOVER
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GREATHOUSE v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89546
Plaintiff:
FRED GREATHOUSE
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMPSON v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89544
Plaintiff:
ROY THOMPSON
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KILEEN v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89518
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KILEEN
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPREHE v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89549
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SPREHE
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89551
Plaintiff:
GLEN ALLEN
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOFSTETTER v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89550
Plaintiff:
WILFORD HOFSTETTER
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.