Cases 21 - 30 of 192
CREEKMORE v. EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55499
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL CREEKMORE
Defendant:
EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCDOUGALL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55427
Plaintiff:
BRUNILDO MCDOUGALL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. , WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55640
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MOORER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55974
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RILLIEUX v. EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
as 2:2011cv52310
Plaintiff:
ERNEST A RILLIEUX
Defendant:
EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. EARL J SMITH COMPANY
as 2:2011cv46752
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
EARL J SMITH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MORRIS et al v. EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39522
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
EARL J. SMITH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65654
Plaintiff:
OTTO B SMITH, JR. and NORMA J SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65102
Plaintiff:
FRANK EDWARD SMITH and DORTHA J SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
