Cases 21 - 30 of 30
TINSLEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71111
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE F. TINSLEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71112
Plaintiff:
DEREK E. TINSLEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71113
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. TINSLEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY et al v. BARTEL et al
as 2:2010cv38917
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. TINSLEY and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
WILLARD E. BARTEL , A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
TINSLEY v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34328
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TINSLEY
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TINSLEY et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88254
Plaintiff:
J. B. TINSLEY and ANNA B. TINSLEY
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MODE et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2009cv70156
Plaintiff:
GERALD TINSLEY MODE and SUSAN R MODE
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TINSLEY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE
as 2:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TINSLEY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TINSLEY v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79518
Plaintiff:
NORMAN TINSLEY
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TINSLEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78623
Plaintiff:
WINDELL L. TINSLEY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
