Cases 31 - 40 of 68
DISALLE et al v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83279
Plaintiff:
EDMUND DISALLE and DOROTHY DISALLE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP., UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER CO. , A/K/A UNARCO IND IND., EAGLE PICHER IND. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTRYMOWICZ v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84264
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J. BUTRYMOWICZ
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TISKA v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84765
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J. TISKA
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELESLINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56978
Plaintiff:
EDMUND L. DELESLINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
O'BRIEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57354
Plaintiff:
EDMUND P. O'BRIEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BRAND v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55279
Plaintiff:
EDMUND V. BRAND
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
NEJMAN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42181
Plaintiff:
EDMUND B. NEJMAN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KWIATKOWSKI v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75688
Plaintiff:
EDMUND A. KWIATKOWSKI
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWEN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73343
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J BOWEN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORKERY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70101
Plaintiff:
EDMUND R. CORKERY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
