Cases 31 - 40 of 1,205
WALKER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13846
Plaintiff:
GARY WALKER and THE ESTATE OF KATHERINE WALKER, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KORDOSKY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13468
Plaintiff:
PATREA KORDOSKY and GARY KORDOSKY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOKMAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12890
Plaintiff:
GARY BOOKMAN, THE ESTATE OF ONELL F. BOOKMAN and WILLIAM J. BOOKMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERKEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12380
Plaintiff:
GARY PERKEY, AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF VIRGINIA DIANE PERKEY PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTE SECTION12-612, AND INDIVIDUALLY, GARY PERKEY and THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA DIANE PERKEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESTATE OF JANET CHUBB et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11978
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JANET CHUBB and GARY CHUBB
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TOWNSEND et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11514
Plaintiff:
GARY TOWNSEND and THE ESTATE OF LINDA TOWNSEND
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMERS INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11069
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS and THE ESTATE OF DONNA TOVAR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMERS INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDROES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11217
Plaintiff:
GARY W ANDROES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSTROW et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv08440
Plaintiff:
GARY J. OSTROW and THE ESTATE OF SONDRA J. OSTROW, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLE et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv08680
Plaintiff:
GARY COLE and THE ESTATE OF MELINDA COLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
