Cases 41 - 50 of 261
ABRAHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03716
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. ABRAHAM , TUNISIA ABRAHAM , HIRAM ALEX and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. CITY LINE AVENUE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2012cv03213
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HARRISON SMITH
Defendant:
CITY LINE AVENUE HOSPITAL, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, AMTRAK POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LITTLE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv02219
Plaintiff:
FLOYD LITTLE , REGGIE SWINTON , HENRY BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABAROJI et al v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
MELCHIZEDEK ABAROJI and CHRISTY HARRISON
Defendant:
WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC. and PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57431
Plaintiff:
DEVAUGHN HARRISON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRISON v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68085
Plaintiff:
ASHTON M. HARRISON, SR.
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRISON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68570
Plaintiff:
ASHTON M. HARRISON, SR.
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRISON v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv59875
Plaintiff:
ASHTON M. HARRISON, SR.
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BANKS v. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2011cv53787
Plaintiff:
HARRISON BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRISON v. CEFOR CARGO & SHIPS INC.
as 2:2011cv52455
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARRISON
Defendant:
CEFOR CARGO & SHIPS INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
