Cases 41 - 47 of 47
WORKMAN v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77445
Plaintiff:
LOVELL D. WORKMAN
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
STAMPLEY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68724
Plaintiff:
JESSE LOVELL STAMPLEY
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURROW et al v. LOVELL et al
as 2:2007cv73622
Plaintiff:
HELEN J. BURROW and DIANA R. ROBINSON
Petitioner:
CONNIE E. POPPLETON
Defendant:
TERRY LYNN LOVELL, AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY and AMOCO OIL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOVELLE HOWARD et al v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2007cv70842
Plaintiff:
LOVELLE HOWARD and REBA HOWARD
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUNCAN et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66156
Plaintiff:
ALFRED G. DUNCAN, MILDRED DUNCAN, JACK LEWIS LOVELL and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ARMSTRONG et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66298
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. ARMSTRONG, JANETTA ARMSTRONG, TROY GERALD BENTLEY and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66634
Plaintiff:
NATHAN W. ADAMS, LUELLA ADAMS, SAMUEL B. ALLEN and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
