Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 68 of 68
WOODROW v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64112
Plaintiff: WOODROW HEATH and WOODROW HEATH
Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64113
Plaintiff: YOME LEE HEATH and YOME LEE HEATH
Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ALLEN et al
as 2:2007cv66367
Plaintiff: RONALD GENE ALLEN, CATHY ALLEN, BRENDA JOYCE BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv64975
Plaintiff: HARRY F. HEATH, HARRY F. HEATH and HARRY F. HEATH
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv63758
Plaintiff: HAROLD GENE HEATH and MARY W. HEATH
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv62685
Plaintiff: MARY HEATH, MARY HEATH, MARY HEATH and others
Defendant: RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY, PREMIER REFRACTORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62643
Plaintiff: JEROME HEATH, JEROME HEATH, JEROME HEATH and others
Defendant: A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEATH et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62535
Plaintiff: JEREMIAH HEATH, JEREMIAH HEATH, JEREMIAH HEATH and others
Defendant: A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?