Cases 71 - 80 of 81
MADDOX v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68984
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MADDOX
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MADDOX v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68983
Plaintiff:
EMMA DEE MADDOX
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MADDOX v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65673
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. MADDOX and ROBERT D. MADDOX
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MADDOX v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65670
Plaintiff:
EMMA DEE MADDOX and EMMA DEE MADDOX
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MADDOX v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65672
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MADDOX and GLORIA MADDOX
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MADDOX v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65671
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS MADDOX and FRANCIS MADDOX
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BARRON et al v. COOPER INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv73704
Plaintiff:
TERRY D BARRON, EMBREW R. BRADBERRY, STEVEN W CARTER and others
Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES, INTERNATIONAL PAPER, OGLEBAY NORTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BARRON et al v. ALLIED SIGNAL INC. et al
as 2:2007cv69220
Plaintiff:
TERRY D. BARRON, EMBREW R. BRADBERRY, STEVEN W. CARTER and others
Defendant:
ALLIED SIGNAL INC., AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ALLEN et al
as 2:2007cv66367
Plaintiff:
RONALD GENE ALLEN, CATHY ALLEN, BRENDA JOYCE BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MADDOX v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2007cv02560
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE MADDOX and FLORENCE MADDOX
Defendant:
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
