Cases 71 - 80 of 261
REAS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv06773
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E REAS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CE THURSTON & SONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKROBIS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67780
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A SKROBIS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CE THURSTON & SONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOIGHT v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67792
Plaintiff:
CHESTER W VOIGHT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRATZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67807
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRATZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOECKMAN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67755
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BOECKMAN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUNK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67841
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P JUNK, SR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. KEMPEN et al
as 2:2010cv67803
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEMPEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRANCKI v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67833
Plaintiff:
GEORGE F KRANCKI
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIPPEL v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67842
Plaintiff:
GERALD E SIPPEL
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPRESTO v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67870
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LAPRESTO
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
