Cases 1 - 10 of 11
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59619
Plaintiff:
WILSON J. ROGERS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RODGERS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64487
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD A. RODGERS and RHONDA J. ROGERS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROGERS et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81179
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. ROGERS and VELMA M. ROGERS
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv82451
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. ROGERS and VELMA M. ROGERS
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO., ATLAS ASBESTOS CO., INC., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60614
Plaintiff:
FURMAN J. ROGERS
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60790
Plaintiff:
FURMAN J. ROGERS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROGERS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv60855
Plaintiff:
FURMAN J. ROGERS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROGERS v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2008cv90772
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J ROGERS and JANET ROGERS
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROGERS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72496
Plaintiff:
GAIL J. ROGERS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
