Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SIMPSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57349
Plaintiff:
GORDON L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SIMPSON v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54641
Plaintiff:
GORDON L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SIMPSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41315
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SIMPSON v. STATES LINES
as 2:2010cv57676
Plaintiff:
GORDON L. SIMPSON and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
STATES LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BALDWIN v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82489
Plaintiff:
LINDA L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SIMPSON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72581
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SIMPSON v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61181
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SIMPSON, ROBERT L. SIMPSON, ROBERT L. SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS et al
as 2:2007cv66362
Plaintiff:
JULIA ANN ATKINS, RALPH E. BALDWIN, MARIE BURL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SIMPSON et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62452
Plaintiff:
DALE L. SIMPSON, DALE L. SIMPSON, DALE L. SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
