Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv06157
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTES et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGERS ESTES and ANN ESTES
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., FLINTKOTE, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76700
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
REGISTER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74419
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGER REGISTER
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROGERS v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv66517
Plaintiff:
BRADY WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FELTON v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION et al
as 2:2009cv60045
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGER FELTON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROGERS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67723
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROGERS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67722
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
