Cases 141 - 150 of 3,859
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. May
as 1:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Michael Broomer
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medley v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
Wilbur L. Medley, III
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert James Piper
Defendant:
Warden Scott Ceresini, Peggy Chrowie, Sherri Gorlwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings, Craig A. Karsnitz, Collins J. Seitz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cephas v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Petitioner:
Vernon E. Cephas
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nasir v. USA
as 1:2023cv00664
Petitioner:
Malik Nasir
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lofland v. Dr. Young et al
as 1:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Kwame Lofland
Defendant:
Dr. Young, Mike Records and Centurion Medical Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Simmons
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Eric-Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
Eric Bernard Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
