Cases 91 - 100 of 730
GARDNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17299
Plaintiff:
KIMBERELY GARDNER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, f/k/a COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION (CTFA) and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16732
Plaintiff:
JEANNE BRUNS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, f/k/a COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION (CTFA) and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CARVALHO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17051
Plaintiff:
STACEY CARVALHO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, f/k/a COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION (CTFA) and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAWKINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17098
Plaintiff:
TEDRICE DAWKINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, f/k/a COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION (CTFA) and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERRONE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MICHELE PERRONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEDBETTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01447
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JEANNETTE LEDBETTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01453
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CITRON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01398
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ROBIN CITRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COUILLARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01399
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
RUTH ANN COUILLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv01403
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JUDITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
