Cases 91 - 100 of 933
SWEENEY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01912
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DENA JOAN SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCADAMS v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv01905
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GROTSKY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01875
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALAN GROTSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEANGELO, JR. v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv01766
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE DEANGELO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv01811
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH S. JOHNSON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ALKIRE v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01717
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALKIRE
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PEREZ v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2020cv01722
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JESUS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
VADEN v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01626
Plaintiff:
BRANDI VADEN
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAPENTA v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01622
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LORI LYNN LAPENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago-Garcia v. Saul
as 2:2020cv01634
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Maria I. Santiago-Garcia
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
