Cases 101 - 110 of 112
JUUL LABS, INC. V. JUUL MONSTER, LLP, ET ALS
as 2:2019cv06399
Defendant:
K & R Products, LLP, Kristen Vanorski, Status Distribution LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Juul Labs, Inc. v. Shenzhen Haka Flavor Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv01832
Defendant:
Shenzhen OCIGA Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Haka Flavor Technology Co., Ltd. and Lizard Juice, LLC
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JUUL LABS, INC v. SARVASVA
as 2:2018cv16331
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC
Defendant:
SARVASVA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL LABS, INC v. SARVASVA
as 2:2018cv16331
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC
Defendant:
SARVASVA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL LABS, INC. v. 4X PODS et al
as 2:2018cv15444
Defendant:
GREGORY GRISHAYEV, JOHN DOES 1-50, 4X PODS and others
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JUUL LABS, INC. v. FLAIR VAPOR, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv14605
Defendant:
SHENZHEN JOECIG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.. and FLAIR VAPOR, LLC
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
JUUL LABS, INC. v. KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2018cv14607
Defendant:
KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD. and KING DISTRIBUTION LLC
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL LABS, INC. v. EONSMOKE, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv14608
Defendant:
THE ELECTRIC TOBACCONIST, LLC, EONSMOKE, LLC and VAPOR 4 LIFE HOLDINGS, INC.,
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL LABS, INC. v. FLAIR VAPOR, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv14605
Defendant:
SHENZHEN JOECIG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.. and FLAIR VAPOR, LLC
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
JUUL LABS, INC. v. KEEP KEEP VAPORT ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.. et al
as 2:2018cv14607
Defendant:
KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD., KING DISTRIBUTION LLC and KEEP VAPORT ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
