Cases 101 - 110 of 144
NIX v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86355
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, VIACOM, INC., BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC. and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. NIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLSEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86356
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD KENNETH OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86357
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., 3M, EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LEE PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERKINS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86358
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POPICK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86359
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN POPICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAAB v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86360
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DAVID RAAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAINE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86361
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., CRANE COMPANY, 3M and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE RAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATCLIFF v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86362
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RELINSKI v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86363
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., JOHN CRANE, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE RELINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDDLE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86364
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY JO RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
