Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 9,594
HALL et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv66735
Plaintiff: HENRY T. HALL, JR. and SOPHIE V. HALL
Defendant: ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., PORTER, H.K., COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LACEWELL v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66674
Plaintiff: ALMOND LACEWELL
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LILLEY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv66673
Plaintiff: JOHNNY L. LILLEY, JR.
Defendant: JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION , JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCAULEY v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66712
Plaintiff: THERON MCCAULEY
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERKKILA v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66145
Plaintiff: JIMMIE LIANE ERKKILA
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY and USS GREAT LAKES FLEET INC.
Thirdparty_defendant: AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65707
Plaintiff: IVAGEAN PHYLLIS CRAWFORD
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIRBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant: EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65615
Plaintiff: DUDLEY E. PARKS and MAY C. PARKS
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS INC , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Counter_defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cross_defendant: EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLOWAY et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv64947
Plaintiff: VAUGHAN B HOLLOWAY, JR , CAROLYN HOLLOWAY and LINDA C HOLLOWAY
Defendant: OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAW et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66146
Plaintiff: IVAN T LAW and MARGIE LAW
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65706
Plaintiff: JAMES J CLARK and CAROL CLARK
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?