Cases 131 - 140 of 39,227
MARTIN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67392
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH K. MARTIN, SR.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANHORN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD
as 2:2011cv67693
Plaintiff:
JESSE M. VANHORN, SR.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67340
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67430
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv46800
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv46901
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KOWALSKI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv46717
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COWART v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45885
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. COWART
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LYBERT v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45889
Plaintiff:
LEON LYBERT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CLEMENT v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45888
Plaintiff:
HARRY F. CLEMENT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
