Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BENESOLE v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60066
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENESOLE
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , BORG-WARNER CORPORATION , GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'AMBROSIO et al v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION et al
as 5:2010cv04848
Plaintiff:
PETER D'AMBROSIO and MARCIA A. D'AMBROSIO
Defendant:
HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION , RAYTHEON COMPANY and BAE SYSTEMS, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CB AVIATION, LLC v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv01411
Plaintiff:
CB AVIATION, LLC
Defendant:
HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MARLOW v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74744
Plaintiff:
ELDON MARLOW and ELDON MARLOW
Defendant:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION and HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MAXEY v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2009cv70658
Plaintiff:
DARRELL MAXEY, DARRELL MAXEY and DARRELL MAXEY
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC., THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60005
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60004
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Seitz et al v. Adel Wiggins Group et al
as 1:2008cv00353
Plaintiff:
Frederick Seitz and Mary Louise Seitz
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins Group, Aerojet General Corporation, Air Cooled Motors and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
