Cases 11 - 20 of 21
COHEN et al v. SUBARU CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv08442
Plaintiff:
GILLES COHEN and JOHN MICKLO
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03232
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STONE, SHIRLEY ALBRIGHT, ALLEN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv04973
Plaintiff:
WALTER GILL
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMATO et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv16118
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. MOORE, JOSEPH AMATO, GEORGE SANDOVAL and others
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMATO et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv16118
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. MOORE, JOSEPH AMATO, GEORGE SANDOVAL and others
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. SUBARU CORPORATION et al.
as 2:2018cv09335
Plaintiff:
BROOKS DAVIS
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION , SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., NORTH AMERICAN SUBARU, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03736
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
AUGUSTINE v. SUBARU OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv13099
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AUGUSTINE
Defendant:
INC. SUBARU OF AMERICA and Subaru Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUGUSTINE v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC et al
as 1:2017cv13099
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AUGUSTINE
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALCEDO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv08173
Plaintiff:
VINCENTE SALCEDO
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
