Cases 21 - 30 of 2,216
Lane v. Aldrich Co. Boilers et al
as 1:2009cv00586
Plaintiff:
Joanne Lane
Defendant:
Aldrich Co. Boilers, AO Smith Water Products Company, AW Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SHOTTS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv67100
Plaintiff:
LULU IRENE SHOTTS
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, AIRGAS MERCHANT GASES, LLC, CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MIKASH v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91142
Plaintiff:
RONALD G MIKASH
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BANDWICK v. AC AND S INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90952
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BANDWICK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC., AC AND S INC., AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PARAMANTGIS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91243
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PARAMANTGIS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COMER v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91108
Plaintiff:
HENRY J COMER
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91227
Plaintiff:
RODERICK ATKINS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CUNNINGHAM v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO et al
as 2:2008cv91368
Plaintiff:
JOHN CUNNINGHAM and JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AZPEITIA v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv90949
Plaintiff:
JOEL C AZPEITIA
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SUFAK et al v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91169
Defendant:
ROBERT SUFAK, AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
