Cases 21 - 30 of 125
CUMMINS v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85805
Plaintiff:
DONALD CUMMINS, DONALD CUMMINS and DONALD CUMMINS
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOOLSBY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85889
Plaintiff:
ORVILLE GOOLSBY and ORVILLE GOOLSBY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
OGBORN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85904
Plaintiff:
REUBEN EUGENE OGBORN and REUBEN EUGENE OGBORN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TUCKER v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85943
Plaintiff:
RALPH ELBERT TUCKER and RALPH ELBERT TUCKER
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARGRAVE v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85972
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARGRAVE and WALTER HARGRAVE
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HENDERSON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85997
Plaintiff:
MILDRED BLACKWELL HENDERSON and MILDRED BLACKWELL HENDERSON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BUCKLEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85991
Plaintiff:
JAMES BUCKLEY, JAMES BUCKLEY and JAMES BUCKLEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85993
Plaintiff:
BYRON L. BROWN, BYRON L. BROWN and BYRON L. BROWN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRANT v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86006
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. GRANT and JOHN D. GRANT
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RIGNEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85977
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL RIGNEY and JOHN PAUL RIGNEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.