Cases 21 - 30 of 5,176
SMITH et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67361
Plaintiff:
CURTIS B. SMITH and VIRGINIA SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAWYER et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67644
Plaintiff:
EDNA P SAWYER and THOMAS R SAWYER
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WIGGINS v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67362
Plaintiff:
EDGAR W. WIGGINS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67430
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARMER v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67641
Plaintiff:
LAURA H FARMER
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67513
Plaintiff:
WALTER C. CLARK and EILEEN D. CLARK
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PULSIFER et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67516
Plaintiff:
DONALD PULSIFER and JEAN PULSIFER
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TREADWELL et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67646
Plaintiff:
LEON TREADWELL and ETHEL TREADWELL
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HATZOPOULOS v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67500
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T. HATZOPOULOS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67549
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. WHITE
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
