Cases 31 - 40 of 4,342
SATTERFIELD, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86589
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILSON SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PERKINS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86358
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86295
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, 3M, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESWIN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COKER v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86742
Plaintiff:
HIRAM JACK COKER and HIRAM JACK COKER
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMAS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86376
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EQUILA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODWARD v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86391
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., JOHN CRANE, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BERTHA WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FROST, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86565
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HENRY FROST
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PITTMAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86764
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PITTMAN and ERNEST PITTMAN
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86324
Defendant:
3M, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86737
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILEY BUTLER and JOHN WILEY BUTLER
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
