Cases 31 - 40 of 3,584
WORLEY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68924
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. WORLEY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEMPLE v. CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68881
Plaintiff:
JOHN N TEMPLE, SR
Defendant:
CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY , DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. , GARLOCK INC., A CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAILY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69003
Plaintiff:
EILEEN DAILY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAIR v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69008
Plaintiff:
GEORGE L PAIR
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68981
Plaintiff:
MELBA CAMBELL SMITH
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECHTOLD v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68993
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BECHTOLD
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADFORD v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68989
Plaintiff:
GLENN A BRADFORD
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PESAVENTO v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69001
Plaintiff:
JAMES D PESAVENTO
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68990
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ADAMS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HATCHER v. A. C. AND S., INC et al
as 2:2010cv68964
Plaintiff:
JAMES E HATCHER
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
