Cases 31 - 37 of 37
HARGRAVES v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69646
Plaintiff:
JIMMY HARGRAVES
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARGRAVE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68454
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. HARGRAVE, SR.
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARGRAVE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv68452
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE HARGRAVE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARGRAVE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv68453
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HARGRAVE, JR.
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARGRAVE et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2007cv71031
Plaintiff:
BETTY HARGRAVE and MARK A. HERBERT
Defendant:
AC&S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARGRAVES et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv70671
Plaintiff:
OTIS L HARGRAVES and DORIS B HARGRAVES
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST, MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DICKINSON et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66198
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. DICKINSON, DORTHA DISMUKE, JR., EVA DISMUKE and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
