Cases 31 - 40 of 4,783
SAMPLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00845
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN SAMPLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPAINES INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THE ESTATE OF CINDY GONZALES MANSFIELD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00846
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CINDY GONZALES MANSFIELD and WILLIAMS MANSFIELD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPAINES INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THE ESTATE OF IRENE FIELDS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00844
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF IRENE FIELDS and RHONDA SAPP
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPAINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRODIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA GRODIS
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AUSTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22364
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE AUSTIN, EMANUEL AVERY, BARRY BARTON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE SALCEDO RIVERA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. ( F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.), LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SERAPILIA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv23016
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
TRACY SERAPILIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHOTTENFELD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv23182
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. SCHOTTENFELD and THE ESTATE OF BARBARA F. SUSSMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HESS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22838
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HESS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SAVKO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22525
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY SAVKO
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
