Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01423
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01379
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01337
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CENTEX HOMES v. JOCAMA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
CENTEX HOMES
Defendant:
JOCAMA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY v. PECHTER'S BAKING GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv05209
Plaintiff:
TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PECHTER'S BAKING GROUP, LLC, RP BAKING, LLC, RP BAKING, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
RP BAKING, LLC and RP BAKING, LLC
Cross Defendant:
PECHTER'S BAKING GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03645
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01221
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02511
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02510
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
