Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lehman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Zach Lehman, Brandon Lerry (Scott), Susan Lewis and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cote et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Hollie Effler, Tara Cote, Sarah Craig and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abbott et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
Dean Abbott, Gerald Abell, Aisha Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hopkins v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
CDK Global, Inc., Leslie A. Brun, Brian Krzanich and others
Morgan v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
CDK Global, Inc., Leslie A. Brun, Willie A. Deese and others
Mutschler v. Mr. Mears et al
as 1:2021cv01640
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Mutschler
Defendant:
Mr. Mears, Jill Mosser, C. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenblatt v. Square, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Defendant:
Square, Inc., Randy Garutti, Mary Meeker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
