Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dougherty et al v. A O Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Dougherty and Elizabeth F. Dougherty
Defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Cross_defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davies et al v. Aurora Pump Company et al
as 1:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Davies and Linda Davies
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc.
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Zeoli v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
Angelo Zeoli
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stone v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., IMO Industries Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Oralia Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dumas v. ABB Group Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dumas
Defendant:
ABB Group Inc., Atlas Copco Compressors LLC , Buffalo Pumps Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company, ABB Group Inc., Atlas Copco Compressors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Walkup et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01635
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Cameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Walkup and Betty Walkup
Cross Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Louis Allis Company and Warren Pumps LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Oates et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff:
Robert Oates, Sr. and Emmaline Oates
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , Compudyne Corporation , Kentile Floors Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
