Cases 41 - 50 of 52
PATERNOSTRO v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63046
Plaintiff:
PASQUALE PATERNOSTRO
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63048
Plaintiff:
L. C. WILLIAMS and CARLINE WILLIAMS
Intervenor_plaintiff:
JOSEPH N. RICE, INC. and MAIANO CARDILLO & SONS
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv62782
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE E. COOK
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAROCCHINI et al v. INTERGY, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63184
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAROCCHINI and THERESA MAROCCHINI
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC., H.B. SMITH CO., INC. , SPRAYCRAFT CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICK et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63045
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. DICK and LOIS DICK
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTA et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63039
Plaintiff:
LORENZO PETTA and PATRICIA PETTA
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
D & A KON-KRETE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RITUCCI et al v. INTERGY, INC., AS SUCCESSOR TO RICHWIL, INC.
as 2:2011cv62787
Plaintiff:
HAROLD RITUCCI and LENA RITUCCI
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC., AS SUCCESSOR TO RICHWIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOSCO et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63038
Plaintiff:
CARMELO BOSCO and MICHELINA BOSCO
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COON et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63041
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. COON and ANN L. COON
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MICENKO et al v. INTERGY, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO RICWIL, INC.
as 2:2011cv63030
Plaintiff:
WALTER MICENKO and ANNA MICENKO
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC. AS SUCCESSOR TO RICWIL, INC.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
TOMLINSON-HAWLEY-PATTERSON, INC. , P. FRANCINI & CO., INC. , GEORGE B.H. MACOMBER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
