Cases 41 - 50 of 82
PICART v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv07433
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. , LEVIN PROPERTIES, LP, ABC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY PICART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSADO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC.
as 2:2017cv07160
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE ROSADO
Cross_claimant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC.
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PACHECO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2017cv06132
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. , KOHL'S ILLINOIS, INC., KOHL'S CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MARILYN PACHECO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
CAPONE et al v. KOHL'S CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv05128
Defendant:
KOHL'S CORPORATION , MANNY MOE (1-10), JOHN DOE(1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA CAPONE and AURELIO T. CAPONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KOHL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04729
Plaintiff:
KAREN KOHL and THOMAS KOHL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBES v. KOHL'S et al
as 2:2017cv04161
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE RUBES
Defendant:
KOHL'S , JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUBERT v. KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES
as 3:2017cv02991
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RUBERT
Defendant:
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
VIGGIANO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 3:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
AMY VIGGIANO
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
TOBAL v. KOHLS CORPORATION
as 3:2016cv08990
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT TOBAL
Defendant:
KOHLS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
AGUILAR v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2016cv08105
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE AGUILAR
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
