Cases 41 - 50 of 70
BRECKER v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70660
Plaintiff:
DELORES M. BRECKER
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , CHRYSLER LLC , CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KROSKE v. UNION CARBIDE et al
as 2:2009cv66764
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. KROSKE
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE, UNION CARBIDE, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MONTGOMERY v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv64624
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HYLAND v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61881
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE HYLAND
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRAVES v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61878
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GRAVES
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARNES v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61873
Plaintiff:
JOE BARNES
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ESPINOZ v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61876
Plaintiff:
LUIS ESPINOZ
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JACKSON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61892
Plaintiff:
LARRY JACKSON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHEETS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61887
Plaintiff:
GERROLD SHEETS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRAY v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61879
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GRAY
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
